Coremed The industry leader in oral and inhaled insulin
NewsProductsTechnologyInvestorsAbout Us
 
  Technology  
Coremed Technology
Research Abstracts
For more information about Coremed please contact info@coremedusa.com
  2001 Endocrine Society 83rd Annual Meeting  
   
  A new intestinal transmucosal insulin formulation (Intesulin) - its glucose responses and insulin pharmacokinetics in diabetic rats and in comparison to subcutaneous insulin injection

F.K. Leung, J. Li, E.C. Leung and L. Huang.

Purpose: To evaluate the insulin pharmacokinetics and glucose responses of an intestinal transmucosal insulin (Intesulin,concentration:25 u. insulin/ml) in diabetic rats and in comparison to Humalog™ (U100,Eli Lilly) subcutaneous injection. Methods: All diabetic rats aged 2-21/2 months. Diabetes was induced by Streptozotocin. Group 1(control, placebo): 4 rats; Group 2(Intesulin,0.2u/gm): 8 rats; Group 3(Humalog,0.2 u/gm): 4 rats; Group 4 (Intesulin, 0.2 u/gm):5 rats; Group 5(Humalog,0.2 u/gm):5 rats. Protocol: All animals received same amount of insulin by weight. After 12 hrs fast, the abdominal wall was dissected. At time 0, Intesulin or placebo was injected through a 30 gauge needle syringe into the duodenum. Insulin was sampled and pooled from the hepatic portal vein, followed by jugular vein from Group 4,5 at 0,5,15,30,60,90,120 min. Glucose was sampled from jugular vein in Group 1,2,3 without insulin sampling at time 0, 5, 15, 30, 60, 120, 180, 240, 300, 360, 420,480,540,600 min. Study was terminated with D50W feeding when glucose was 80 mg/ml or lower. Statistical Analysis: SAS system,v6.12: non-compartmental calculation of Pk parameters, Dunnett's t for multiple comparisons, repeated measures analysis of slope. Data and Summary: 1)Significant hypoglycemia onset: Group 3:15 min., Group 2:60 min. 2)Glucose reduction slope: Group 3:-40.9% per hour, Group 2: -12.2% per hour.3) Glucose Nadir: Group 3: 20% of time 0 at 120 min., Group 2: 20% of time 0 at 540 min. 4)Hepatic portal vein insulin peak absorption: Group 2: 1728 min/ml at 5 min.5)Glucose AUC_average over time mean: Group 1:80.1 (min.45.6,max.114.1);Group 2:59.4 (min.42.2,max.89.2); Group 3:61.2 (min.44.6,max.76.2) At 120 min., Intesulin achieved 41.3% of glucose reduction by Humalog injection. Conclusion: Intesulin lowers glucose in diabetic rats in a linear slope from time 0 to 540 min. It has an extremely rapid insulin absorption at 5 min. and increased by 23351% from time 0. Although Humalog has a quicker onset of action, intesulin achieved the same end point as Humalog and its AUC_glucose is the same as the latter, suggesting of comparable and sustained efficacy as in Humalog injection.

 
  A new intragastric transmucosal insulin (Gastrisulin) - its glucose responses in non-diabetic rats and in comparison to its Azone (Laurocapram) formulation.

F.K. Leung, J. Li, L. Huang and E. C. Leung,

Purpose: To evaluate the glucose reponses between Gastrisulin-C (intragastric oral insulin delivery) and subcutaneous Humalog™ injections in non-diabetic rats and in comparison to its Azone formulation. Methods: All rats aged between 1 1/2-2 months. Group 1(control, placebo):5 rats,Group 2 (Gastrisulin-C, 12.5u):5 rats, Group 3 (Humalog, 12.5u): 4 rats,Group 4 (Gastrisulin-Azone, 25 u):5 rats. Protocol: After fasting for 12 hrs, blood glucose was sampled and measured from the jugular vein in Group 1,2,3,4 at time:0,5,10,15,30,60,90,120,150,180,210,240,270,300 min. Ether was used for anesthesia. At time 0, the abdominal wall was opened, Gastrisulin-C, or Gastrisulin-Azone or Placebo was injected into the superior antrum of the stomach by a 30 gauge syringe. The junction between the stomach and duodenum was gently clamped to prevent leakage of content into the intestine. Group 3 rats received identical surgical procedure and Humalog injection subcutaneous in the abdominal wall. The surgical wound was immediately closed after drug or placebo administration. Statistical Analysis: SAS system,v6.12:non-compartmental calculation of Pk parameters, Dunnett's t for multiple comparisons, repeated measures analysis slope. Data and Summary:1) Blood Glucose at time 0,15,60,120,180 min.: Control 100%,150%, 160%,175%,160%.Gastrisulin-C -100%,88%,75%,78%,70%. Gastrisulin-Azone-100%,105%,85%, 78%,75%. Humalog -100%,21%,18%,18%,15%. 2) Significant hypoglycemia: Gastrisulin-C or -Azone: 15 min., Humalog - 5 min. 3) AUC_mean: Gastrisulin-C or -Azone: 90, Humalog -25.013, Control -164.091. 4)Gastrisulin-C at 12.5 u has similar hypoglycemic efficacy as Gastrisulin-Azone at 25 u. 5) Gastrisulin-C achieves 61.7% of the Humalog hypoglycemic efficacy at 120 min. Conclusion: Gastrisulin-C is a very effective transmucosal insulin formulation even when it is given intragastrically. Adding Azone (Laurocapram), a transdermal enhancer, does not improve the Gastrisulin efficacy. Gastrisulin-C has a rapid onset and sustained hypoglycemic action over 3-5 hours.

 
  A new oral insulin formulation (Musulin) - its glucose responses and insulin pharmacokinetics in non-diabetic rats and in comparison to subcutaneous insulin injection.

J. Li, F.K. Leung, L. Huang and E.C. Leung.

Purpose: To evaluate the glucose reponses and insulin pharmacokinetics between Musulin (25 u insulin/ml) and subcutaneous Humalog ™ (Eli Lilly, U100) injections in non-diabetic rats. Methods: All rats aged 11/2-2 months. Group 1 (control, placebo): 5 rats, Group 2 (Musulin, 12.5 u): 4 rats, Group 3 (Humalog, 12.5 u): 4 rats, Group 4 (Musulin, 12.5 u): 5 rats. Group 5 (Humalog,12.5u):5 rats. Protocol: After 12 hours fast, blood glucose was sampled from jugular veins in Group 1,2,3 at time: 0,5,15,30,60,90,120,150,180,210, 240,300 minutes. Musulin or placebo was fed perorally in Group 1,2,4 at time 0. Humalog was injected subcutaneously in the abdomen of Group 3,5 at time 0. Insulin was measured from jugular veins and pooled in Group4,5 at time 0,15,30,60,120,300,480 minutes. Statistical Analysis: SAS system,v6.12:non- compartmental calculation of Pk parameters, Dunnett's t for multiple comparison and repeated measures analysis of slope. Data and Summary:1)% glucose reduction at time 0,30,60,120,150 min.- Control: 100%,119%,125%,140%,116%; Musulin group:100%, 95%, 88%,78%62%; Humalog group:100%,28%, 28%,22%,17%.2)Significant hypoglycemia: Musulin: 15 min., Humalog: 5 min..3)Peak insulin absorption: Musulin - 15 min., Humalog - 60 min.4) Cmax insulin: Musulin - 229 min/ml, Humalog - 9260 min/ml.5)Total insulin bioavailablity: 3.2%(AUC_Tauc), 2.2% (AUC_infinity),0.95% (AUC_average). 6)Insulin half life: Musulin- 99.66 min., Humalog - 38.56 min.,7)Hypoglycemic efficacy (AUC_average Glucose divided by AUC_average Insulin absorbed):Musulin - 112.405/55.24=2.0348,Humalog - 24.013/5803.33 = 0.00413 8) Relative insulin potency ( Musulin divided by Humalog hypoglycemic potency): 2.0348/0.00413 = 491.77.Conclusion: 1)Musulin has a quick onset action and peak insulin absorption at 15 min. 2)Musulin achieves 42.3 -45.6% of the Humalog injection hypoglycemic efficacy between 60-120 min. 3)Its total insulin bioavailability is 0.95% (AUC_average). However, it is much more potent than Humalog injection when considered its hypoglycemic action per unit insulin absorbed. Musulin is a relatively potent and efficacious form of oral insulin with sustained hypoglycemic action over 3-5 hours.

 
 
Home  |  News  |  Products  |  Technology  |  Investors  |  About Us  ©2004 Coremed, Inc.